Beyond the Pulpit Apology: Rwanda’s Gitwaza Storm Reveals Deeper Tensions Between Faith, Healthcare, and Public Trust
KIGALI / WASHINGTON — A viral sermon clip, a swift church apology, and a nation still arguing: this week Rwanda watched one of its most prominent Pentecostal leaders navigate the fallout from remarks that linked nurses and midwives to witchcraft. Yet on X and across Rwandan conversations, the discussion has already moved past the formal “sorry.”
Apostle Dr. Paul Gitwaza, founder of Authentic Word Ministries and senior pastor of Zion Temple Celebration Center, delivered the remarks on August 7.
In Kinyarwanda he stated that a spirit of witchcraft dwells in many nurses and midwives, placed there by Satan. The clip began circulating widely around October 6. Within a day the church issued a communiqué signed by Gitwaza himself. It acknowledged the wording caused hurt and concern, insisted there was never any intent to demean the profession, and confirmed dialogue with the Rwanda Nurses and Midwives Union. The union publicly noted the apology as a constructive step while reiterating that the original message had dishonored their work.
That, however, is only the official layer. On X this week the debate has been sharper and more personal.
Some voices insist the church statement is insufficient. Users have demanded Gitwaza stand before his congregation in the first person, retract the claim, and issue a “reverse preaching.” Others label him a false prophet and scammer, arguing the remarks form part of a pattern and that accountability requires more than a signed communiqué. One widely engaged post questioned how nursing representatives approached the church seeking an apology rather than the reverse, framing it as an inversion of responsibility.
Supporters push back equally hard. They argue that every human leader makes mistakes, that Gitwaza’s name and signature appear on the apology, and that refusing to accept it undermines reconciliation—a core biblical principle. Posts emphasize that physical presence at the original pulpit is unnecessary for public accountability and that demanding endless further gestures risks turning grace into a weapon.
A third current focuses on practical consequences. Critics warn the remarks could erode public confidence in facility-based deliveries at a time when Rwanda has made measurable progress reducing maternal and infant mortality. Healthcare workers, already operating under pressure, saw the generalization as an attack on their professional image without evidence. Faith leaders, meanwhile, are being reminded—sometimes gently, sometimes harshly—of the weight their words carry in a society where churches remain highly influential.
For American readers the episode lands at a familiar intersection: charismatic Christianity, professional dignity, and the limits of spiritual speech in the public square. Rwanda’s rapid development story, its emphasis on evidence-based health systems, and its vibrant Pentecostal scene make the controversy unusually visible. Gitwaza is no fringe figure; Zion Temple is among the country’s larger congregations, and he is recognized as a preacher, author, and community actor of more than two decades.
The apology closed one chapter. The conversation on X shows another is still open: how religious leaders balance prophetic language with respect for evidence-based professions, how institutions rebuild trust after viral offense, and whether a signed statement satisfies a public that increasingly expects personal accountability. Rwanda’s nurses and midwives continue their work. The debate over the words that briefly cast a shadow on that work continues with them.
About The Author
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
